Copyright disputes now distinguish model outputs, training copies, lawful access, and remedies rather than one broad question about 'AI art.'
Generative AI
The crisis of authenticity
When generation becomes cheap, what makes authorship, evidence, and trust expensive?
The seminar joins training-data governance, copyright, attribution, synthetic media, provenance, companionship, labour, and the environmental and epistemic costs of scale.
Join the live roomBefore class
Bring one synthetic artifact and document what can and cannot be known about its provenance, consent, authorship, and truth.
After class
Write a product policy for disclosure, provenance, misuse response, and remedy.
The promise
By the end of this room…
- 01Separate copyrightability, infringement, licensing, attribution, and ethical consent.
- 02Evaluate provenance systems without treating them as truth machines.
- 03Analyze deepfakes through speech, fraud, evidence, and power.
- 04Identify distinctive risks of companion and persuasive generative systems.
Why this week now
Signals, not scene-setting.
Authenticity infrastructure can show provenance while leaving intent, truth, context, and missing metadata unresolved.
Companion systems turn sustained relational interaction into a product surface with safety and dependency duties.
Run of show
Provoke → frame → work → argue → synthesize.
- 0:00provocation
Commit before the concepts
If a generated image has perfect provenance metadata, is it authentic?
Live activity · week 11 opening - 0:15frame
Training, transformation, and authorship
Copyright disputes now distinguish model outputs, training copies, lawful access, and remedies rather than one broad question about 'AI art.'
- 0:45discussion
Reading tension
Student leaders present the assigned readings as a clash of defensible positions, then moderate questions that expose the hidden assumptions.
- 1:10frame
Provenance is not truth
Authenticity infrastructure can show provenance while leaving intent, truth, context, and missing metadata unresolved.
- 1:35break
Break
Ten minutes. Leave the room's unresolved question visible.
- 1:45forensics
Spot-the-deepfake evidence lab
Role-based groups work the anchor case through technical, legal, stakeholder, and normative lenses.
Deliverable · A two-minute finding with evidence, uncertainty, and an actionable remedy.Live activity · week 11 forensics - 2:25controversy
Generative-AI copyright moot
Assigned positions, side-switch, and a joint recommendation that names the value or stakeholder it leaves exposed.
Live activity · week 11 controversy - 2:50synthesis
Re-vote and leave a trace
Repeat the opening vote, inspect what moved, and submit the strongest argument you still reject.
Live activity · week 11 exit
Case room
Evidence before opinion.
Training-data litigation
Which copies, uses, and remedies are actually at issue?
C2PA provenance
What trust problem does signed metadata solve—and which remain?
Stochastic parrots
Which scale costs disappear when we discuss only output quality?
Reading stack
Read the tension, not the bibliography.
- 01CoreOn the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots ↗
Bender et al.
- 02CurrentCopyright and Artificial Intelligence ↗
U.S. Copyright Office
- 03ReferenceC2PA Technical Specification ↗
C2PA
Evidence ledger
Every case has a receipt.
3 primary, scholarly, or first-party sources
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots
Connects scale, training data, environmental cost, documentation, and harms from fluent language systems.
Research paper ↗Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
Primary policy materials on digital replicas, copyrightability, and generative-AI training.
Policy report series ↗C2PA Technical Specification
A technical approach to signed provenance whose limits reveal why authenticity is not solved by metadata alone.
Provenance standard ↗