// course · read in orderest. 2026 · no ads · anonymous stats
W06Course shell3 hours

Bias in AI

Sources, impacts, and mitigation

What does it mean to mitigate bias when the institution itself is unequal?

The course returns to bias with the full data, metric, privacy, and accountability toolkit to compare mitigation strategies and their institutional limits.

Join the live room

Before class

Bring one bias-mitigation proposal and state the causal mechanism it assumes.

After class

Rewrite it as an intervention plan with a metric, affected group, owner, monitoring signal, and appeal route.

The promise

By the end of this room…

  1. 01Diagnose structural, historical, measurement, model, and deployment bias.
  2. 02Compare pre-, in-, and post-processing mitigations.
  3. 03Test subgroup performance without reducing justice to a dashboard.
  4. 04Match a mitigation to a causal mechanism and an institutional duty.

Why this week now

Signals, not scene-setting.

01

Removing protected attributes rarely removes the social structure encoded by proxies and targets.

02

A mitigation can improve one metric while worsening calibration, utility, burden, or legitimacy.

03

The repair target may be a workflow, target, or institution—not the model.

Run of show

Provoke → frame → work → argue → synthesize.

Open student room ↗
  1. 0:00
    provocation

    Commit before the concepts

    If race is removed from a model, is the resulting decision process less biased?

    Live activity · week 6 opening
  2. 0:15
    frame

    Bias is a causal claim

    Removing protected attributes rarely removes the social structure encoded by proxies and targets.

  3. 0:45
    discussion

    Reading tension

    Student leaders present the assigned readings as a clash of defensible positions, then moderate questions that expose the hidden assumptions.

  4. 1:10
    frame

    Mitigation without metric shopping

    A mitigation can improve one metric while worsening calibration, utility, burden, or legitimacy.

  5. 1:35
    break

    Break

    Ten minutes. Leave the room's unresolved question visible.

  6. 1:45
    forensics

    Obermeyer proxy autopsy

    Role-based groups work the anchor case through technical, legal, stakeholder, and normative lenses.

    Deliverable · A two-minute finding with evidence, uncertainty, and an actionable remedy.Live activity · week 6 forensics
  7. 2:25
    controversy

    Fairness-metric stakeholder role-play

    Assigned positions, side-switch, and a joint recommendation that names the value or stakeholder it leaves exposed.

    Live activity · week 6 controversy
  8. 2:50
    synthesis

    Re-vote and leave a trace

    Repeat the opening vote, inspect what moved, and submit the strongest argument you still reject.

    Live activity · week 6 exit

Case room

Evidence before opinion.

Anchor

Obermeyer healthcare algorithm

Why was changing the target more direct than removing race?

Science

Reading stack

Read the tension, not the bibliography.

  1. 01
    CoreDissecting racial bias in a health-care algorithm

    Obermeyer et al.

  2. 02
    CoreGender Shades

    Buolamwini & Gebru

Evidence ledger

Every case has a receipt.

4 primary, scholarly, or first-party sources