// course · read in orderest. 2026 · no ads · anonymous stats
W07Course shell3 hours

Mid-Course Review

The architecture of ethical analysis

Can you turn seven weeks of concepts into one repeatable audit practice?

A full workshop week: teams integrate technical evidence, ethical frameworks, stakeholders, law, uncertainty, pre-mortems, and an ethical matrix into the capstone method.

Join the live room

Before class

Bring a capstone candidate and a one-page system boundary: purpose, actors, data, model, workflow, affected parties, and current controls.

After class

Submit the revised system boundary, first ethical matrix, and top five pre-mortem failures.

The promise

By the end of this room…

  1. 01Run the course's ethical-analysis sequence end to end.
  2. 02Build a stakeholder × principle ethical matrix.
  3. 03Conduct a pre-mortem and prioritize failures by severity and likelihood.
  4. 04Distinguish a claim, its evidence, uncertainty, owner, and remedy.

Why this week now

Signals, not scene-setting.

01

Good audits connect evidence to governance decisions rather than accumulating principles.

02

A pre-mortem protects against the success narrative becoming the only scenario the team can imagine.

03

The capstone is an adversarial defense, so uncertainty and counter-evidence are first-class artifacts.

Run of show

Provoke → frame → work → argue → synthesize.

Open student room ↗
  1. 0:00
    provocation

    Commit before the concepts

    Which layer most often makes an AI audit fail?

    Live activity · week 7 opening
  2. 0:15
    frame

    From principle list to audit trail

    Good audits connect evidence to governance decisions rather than accumulating principles.

  3. 0:45
    discussion

    Reading tension

    Student leaders present the assigned readings as a clash of defensible positions, then moderate questions that expose the hidden assumptions.

  4. 1:10
    frame

    SMACTR, ethical matrix, pre-mortem

    A pre-mortem protects against the success narrative becoming the only scenario the team can imagine.

  5. 1:35
    break

    Break

    Ten minutes. Leave the room's unresolved question visible.

  6. 1:45
    forensics

    Clearview synthesis speed round

    Role-based groups work the anchor case through technical, legal, stakeholder, and normative lenses.

    Deliverable · A two-minute finding with evidence, uncertainty, and an actionable remedy.Live activity · week 7 forensics
  7. 2:25
    controversy

    Capstone red-team clinic

    Assigned positions, side-switch, and a joint recommendation that names the value or stakeholder it leaves exposed.

    Live activity · week 7 controversy
  8. 2:50
    synthesis

    Re-vote and leave a trace

    Repeat the opening vote, inspect what moved, and submit the strongest argument you still reject.

    Live activity · week 7 exit

Case room

Evidence before opinion.

Canonical

Amazon hiring reconstruction

Which audit artifact would have surfaced the failure earliest?

EAAMO / arXiv

Reading stack

Read the tension, not the bibliography.

  1. 01
    CoreClosing the AI Accountability Gap

    Raji et al.

  2. 02
    ReferenceAI Risk Management Framework

    NIST

Evidence ledger

Every case has a receipt.

4 primary, scholarly, or first-party sources